racial profiling and being 14 years old

Emerging from a past of racial discrimination and prejudice, one of the hopes for a new South Africa is that young people will be born and grow up in a society where they are simply human beings rather than being racialised human beings. There is a hope that our children will escape the scourge of racial profiling and live in a non-racial society.

This assumption is ill-informed and dangerous because we fail to see that our children are being raised in communities and homes where racism is still part of their experience. As a high school teacher, I interact with young people everyday and I have been aghast and appalled at the level of prejudice amongst them. I have been confronted with sexism and racism from children that have been dubbed as the “born-free generation” in South Africa. Most of the time these comments are said in jest and the humour is meant to shroud the racial undertones. These are the children who know nothing of apartheid except what is written in history books. However, they are not interested in history and what it means for their future. They do however experience the backlash of apartheid South Africa and this is prevalent in their conversations and how they relate to one another.

I recently had a conversation with Grade 8 girls who openly and crudely racially classified themselves as black and because of their blackness, they choose to be rebellious. They misbehave and show a lack of interest in their work and have a bad attitude towards others who aren’t part of their group. They openly give in to the pressure of being cliquely and only hang out with other black girls in their grade. They have a mob mentality and they attribute this to the fact that they are black in a school that is not racially diverse—where racial diversity means having more white people in our school. Their identity is complex and revolves around their idea of what it means to be black in relation to being white and coloured[1]. They define their role in the school in relation to an abstract idea of what it would mean if there were more white learners at the school. These teenagers are hardly 14 years old; younger than South Africa’s democracy but their attitudes show me that the “born free” generation is not free but part of a racist society where they are willing participants in negative racial stereotyping where white is seen as better and black is seen as negative.

My learners’ attitudes about race speak to the need to challenge the way we perceive blackness and whether it’s possible to address non-racialism without acknowledging the current racism. The idea that children will become colour blind because we do not talk about race or simply eschew the need to talk about people being black or white assumes that race will go away over time. The challenge with the ideas I’m presenting here is that the complexities about race are always centred around the question of being black or white without the nuances of other identity markers that people choose to take on. In South Africa, we have a limited discourse about race where it’s about being black or white that we can’t move onto other possibilities about what it means to be in the world. We treat race markers as though people wake up in the morning and the first thing they think of is “I’m black”.

This always leaves me wondering about what non-racialism means. Do we ignore and obliterate racial markers or engaging them so we can find new meanings about our way of being in the world? Or do we question race in its crude form as was the case with the Black Consciousness Movement?  

[1] In South Africa, Coloured refers to a racial group of people from Cape Malay descent (As a result of Race Classification during apartheid)


Anonymous said…
Race is a classification system used to categorize humans into large and distinct populations or groups by heritable phenotypic characteristics, geographic ancestry, physical appearance, ethnicity, and social status. [Wiki]. I think your point is valuable in that, we have only relied on the physical appearance as the only marker for addressing the issue of race. Willie Lynch (slave master in 18th century) used FEAR, DISTRUST, and ENVY to control his slaves. Envy seems to be the major character that divides the society. From Lynch's view point one can say it was implanted to humanity to think of race from the colour of our skins. Maybe we can teach the young people about race based on the definition by the Wikipedia as quoted above. That is to say race also means being classified by social status . So the fact that they come from different contexts/backgrounds, even though all black, means that they are racially diverse.

Anonymous said…
Did you see this article? http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/dec/06/south-africa-racially-divided-survey
Scary, but interesting stuff.
assignments web said…
Nice blog to reading thanks for sharing such useful information this is very helpful for students who learn online and want Assignment Help .And keep continue to sharing useful information for us.
darlington saro said…
Nice and informative Blog regarding assignments
this is really helpful for people who interested in Online Education.
Thanks and Keep Continue to share useful information with us.

Popular posts from this blog

A good makoti doesn't sleep in

Lalela: Zimamele — a place for listening to yourself